Separacao

ÍNDEX

INTRODUCTION        

DEVELOPMENT        

CONCLUSION        

BIBLIOGRAPHY        

INTRODUCTION

Every mystery requires an investigation to resolve them, so it happened in the case of shoe mystery and the mystery of the plates. The stories are the same aspects as well as different. This essay aims to make a comparison and contrast them.

In the pages that follow, this patent phrases indicating similarities and differences between the two (2) texts.

DEVELOPMENT

The history has a characteristic investigated in both cases of theft depicts a situation that was performed by the same people residence.

In both stories, the situation of theft and investigates for two (2) people where the main tracks of the investigation were obtained by observation method in the field (backyard), which the same yard they were with all the unmade grass this due to works modernization of sewage system.

In all cases the mysteries were unveiled with success, as happened in the mystery of shoes in the mystery of the boards was also possible thanks to a team effort to find those responsible for the theft. And striking that in both stories investigations were only to unravel the mystery and not to take action for the same acts from happening again.

Despite the focus of the story is the same, there are some major differences between them. The mystery of the shoe this was investigated for two apparent intelligent second friendly displays the text, but the mystery of the boards that was carried out by two professional detectives, noted that the gravities of the situations are totally different being the shoes of mystery appear less difficulties despite that in seeking the shoes of Jane was possible to recover other items belonging to family members. The mystery boards that yes presented more difficulties for it was the same item theft in more than two different houses affected a half Pickle Street. This case needed more thought to their resolution, deferential the friends, these detectives take that traversing a street to find the solution of the problem in the case of research. The detectives noted that the thefts were not run by just one person, but rather by several with these boys.

When Jane noticed that there was not muddy footprints on the porch, so no one had crossed the threshold in their shoes, minutes later appeared the Muppet until Jane realized that the theft had been run by an animal and not by one person, such a conclusion compressed when asked, the mother of Gina and she said had not taken her shoes. Detective Harvey when he realized that in each of the houses in missing the signs lived in it a boy, such a conclusion given the fact that the homes possess typical item of the boys like as bicycles, boy boots, curtains Speed ​​Racer. For this they had from house to house to walk until they reached the wooden house built by the boys on top of a tree.